Want to be happy? Live out loud, be who you are, conduct yourself with integrity, reach out to others, stand up to injustice, satisfy your soul, don’t allow yourself to continue to live with regrets or leave things undone; and, peace will be yours forever! Words to live by.
Posts Tagged ‘injustice’
Want to be Happy?
Posted in Dreams, emotions, Faith, family, future, goals, happiness, health, Heart, hopes, Impact, inspiration, joy, life, meaning of life, mental and physical health, opinion, service, well-being, tagged be of service to others, conduct, Dreams, emotions, goals, Happy, Impact, injustice, integrity, joy, Live, mental and physical, peace, regrets, soul, wants, well-being, words on November 26, 2008| Leave a Comment »
Smoking Gun Forces Legal Showdown
Posted in children, elderly, Frustration, health, home, mental and physical health, power, stress, tagged abusive, apartment, corrective actions, court costs, endanger, injustice, justice health, lawyers, restaurants, rights, smoking, stress on April 5, 2008| 1 Comment »
This recent news item flipped my sense of injustice/justice button. I read a news report about an elderly woman who lives in New York City. This woman’s name is Galila Huff and she is a smoker. She owns a restaurant in town; but, she isn’t allowed to smoke there because state law forbids smoking in restaurants or bars.
Ms Huff has lived in her apartment for 15 years which is a few blocks away from her restaurant. She has smoked in her apartment for years with no problems. It is her personal place of residence. The problem started about 5 years or so ago when new neighbors moved into her building. They allegedly started complaining about smelling smoke in the communal hallway.
Ms Huff made attempts to contain the smoke in her personal living space; after she was made aware of the situation by a letter from her neighbors. She had the walls of her apartment insulated, she tried to quit smoking…and wasn’t successful, she purchased four large air purifiers, she had the airducts sealed, improved the windows, and still the neighbors complained about the smell of smoke.
The neighbors allegedly filed a lawsuit. They first sent her a letter telling her to quit smoking IN HER APARTMENT until such a time that she could ventilate the smoke away from the hallway outside of her door. For the record, the neighbors are each lawyers. They have a small child. They claim that the smoke in the hallway endangers their health and that of their child.
Since they moved into the apartment, long after Ms Huff established the apartment building as her residence, you would think they would have noticed the smell when they were considering moving into the building.
Regardless, i am not a huge fan of cigarette smoke. I am myself allergic to it. But, this legal fight seems a bit over the top to me. I mean it would be different, i think, had Ms. Huff not taken some corrective actions to reduce the amount of smoke that could be released into the hallway.
She didn’t ignore their request. Doesn’t she have a right to smoke in her home? Certainly, i can understand their right to a smoke free environment; but, since Ms. Huff did take action if they still felt that an excess amount of smoke was entering the hallway endangering them …shouldn’t they consider moving themselves? Or perhaps, they could consider installing an air purifier in their own apartment. This i am sure is very stressful for all involved.
I guess, i don’t understand what more they can realistically expect Ms. Huff to do. It seems abusive to me to continue to bully her when she has made an honest attempt to improve the situation.
From what i understand, this shared hallway is like 10 feet wide and a hundred feet long and the neighbor’s doorway is 50 feet approximately away from Ms. Huff’s doorway. Is Ms. Huff legally responsible to do more? I certainly hope not.
I do believe in people respecting each others personal space when smoking…but, i also believe that once she was made aware of the problem, that Ms. Huff truly attempted to correct it. To me, the whole situation is over the top.
Hopefully, the judge who rules on this suit will use a heavy dose of common sense to decide the case. If all is right in the world, the judge will refund any excess court cost incurred by Ms Huff, after she attempted to reticfy the situation, due to the continued legal badgering from her neighbors. That would balance things a bit i think.
First Born Birthrights Denied
Posted in adoption, birthday, children, denial, kids, MONEY, mother, sadness, Sisterhood, tagged adoption, birthparent, birthrights, born, child, court, denied, estate, fortune, infant, injustice, jello, laws, marriage, MONEY, mother, New York State, personal, rejected, search, siblings, sister, trust on March 17, 2008| 4 Comments »
Wow, who knew that it mattered, when you were born, which side of the blanket you were born on when it comes to getting your birthright inheritence or whether your rights will be denied?
Is a child’s birthright not automatic when that birthparent gives the child up for adoption? No, it can be denied in the state of New York, anyway.
Today, i read in the news that a woman born over 50 years ago to a direct descendent of the jello fortune was denied by the highest court in New York the right to a portion of that said fortune.
It seems that the estate of the woman’s birthmother denied that she was entitled to a third of the estate; because, she had been put up for adoption and, because the laws of the state said that a child put up for adoption wasn’t considered a child of the person for whom the trust was established.
The mother of the “child” went on to get married later after putting up the infant for adoption and went on to have two additional children who were entitled to their portion of the estate because they were born during her marriage.
Does that seem fair? The child did not have a say about when she was conceived or to whom she was born; she was born to the woman and allegedly, to a man who was married to someone else. Is it her fault about the circumstances of her birth? No. Was it her choice to be adopted? No. Still, i guess legally…the decision has been made.
My question is…morally is it a correct decision? I wonder how the birth, half- siblings feel? I mean, obviously the estate felt that they had a right to fight paying a portion of the trust fund to this woman; but, personally, if it were me….i would feel that she was entitled to a sum of money.
The woman started searching for her birthparents when she was 19. She spent lots of money and time searching. She didn’t start her search thinking that she was going to discover she was born to a family with incredible riches that she could inherit. I am sure that she began searching strictly for the purpose of finding out more about herself personally.
Whatever her personal reasons for searching; I hope she found some kind of answers to her questions when she met her mother. She did get to meet her and find out about her birth circumstances. Hopefully she was able to heal those parts of herself that were filled with questions when she discovered she had a NEED to know about her beginnings.
It seems that these questions about the trust fund came up after the birth mother died. Who knows what the birth mother’s feelings were on the subject. That wasn’t reported in anything i have heard about this trust fund issue with the courts. Was the woman and her siblings able to develop any type of postitive relationship? If so, why the issue of money went before the court is curious.
If the half siblings contested sharing the money…i then wonder, what makes them in their own minds feel more entitled? It is kind of sad. Who knows how much richer their lives could have been otherwise. I mean, i wonder if they would find joy in knowing their sister had there not been money involved? Maybe it isn’t just an issue of money; could it be some other reason that they feel she is not entitled to a share of the wealth? I wonder is the sister the kind of person that would not be welcome in a family whether they had money or not? Is she a good, friendly, moral person?
Some how, it feels like an injustice. I mean, the half siblings got to grow up with their mother. The woman did not. They were born to a comfortable lifestyle; did the woman live in comfort? Should she be compensated for being rejected at her birth? I don’t know. But regardless, it just feels a little unfair to me.